Public preview
Evidence For-Against Dialogue
Put your negative thought on trial: what's the evidence for and against? Then judge.
Goal
Separate thought from fact via courtroom method, so thoughts aren't treated as facts.
Steps
-
1
Write the negative thought. e.g., "No one likes me".
Expected Outcome
Immediate
The thought loses 40-60% of emotional grip.
Evidence base
School: CBT
Founders: Aaron T. Beck (1979)
The second core CBT tool after thought records.
Keywords
Frequently asked questions
How long does "Evidence For-Against Dialogue" take?
This exercise takes about 15 minutes, practiced solo in a Written reflection format.
When will I notice the effect of "Evidence For-Against Dialogue"?
The thought loses 40-60% of emotional grip. In the short term: Inner courtroom becomes automatic after 10 applications.
Is "Evidence For-Against Dialogue" evidence-based?
Yes — it draws on CBT (Aaron T. Beck (1979)). The second core CBT tool after thought records.
Is "Evidence For-Against Dialogue" suitable for beginners?
Its difficulty level is: Intermediate. No external tools required — it can be practiced directly inside the app.
Subscribe for full access
Subscribe to Plus for full access to this practice and the whole catalogue, or try first — free, no sign-in, no commitment.
7 complete practices (one per domain) are free forever, no sign-in.