Public preview

Evidence For-Against Dialogue

“Evidence For-Against Dialogue” is a short 15-minute practice from Zayenha Practice in the Psychological domain. Put your negative thought on trial: what's the evidence for and against? Then judge. It draws on CBT. You can read its goal and first step for free; the full practice with every step and the interactive part comes with Plus.

Put your negative thought on trial: what's the evidence for and against? Then judge.

15 min Intermediate

Goal

Separate thought from fact via courtroom method, so thoughts aren't treated as facts.

Steps

1

Write the negative thought. e.g., "No one likes me".

4 more steps locked

Expected Outcome

Immediate

The thought loses 40-60% of emotional grip.

Evidence base

School: CBT

Founders: Aaron T. Beck (1979)

The second core CBT tool after thought records.

Frequently asked questions

How long does "Evidence For-Against Dialogue" take?

This exercise takes about 15 minutes, practiced solo in a Written reflection format.

When will I notice the effect of "Evidence For-Against Dialogue"?

The thought loses 40-60% of emotional grip. In the short term: Inner courtroom becomes automatic after 10 applications.

Is "Evidence For-Against Dialogue" evidence-based?

Yes — it draws on CBT (Aaron T. Beck (1979)). The second core CBT tool after thought records.

Is "Evidence For-Against Dialogue" suitable for beginners?

Its difficulty level is: Intermediate. No external tools required — it can be practiced directly inside the platform.

Subscribe for full access

Subscribe to Plus for full access to this practice and the whole catalogue, or try first — free, no sign-in, no commitment.

Interactive practice locked · 4 more steps locked

7 complete practices (one per domain) are free forever, no sign-in.