Public preview

Lateral Reading, Not Vertical

Don't read a strange site top-to-bottom. Open 5 tabs searching "about" the site, then decide trust.

8 min Intermediate

Goal

Apply professional historians' method: determine source credibility before reading content.

Steps

1

When you find strange site/surprising claim: don't start reading the page.

4 more steps locked

Expected Outcome

Immediate

You save 10-15 min reading untrustworthy site.

Evidence base

School: Civic Online Reasoning

Founders: Sam Wineburg · Mike Caulfield (2017)

Wineburg's Stanford 2017 study compared expert (historian) reading with college students, proving "lateral reading" is the differentiating skill.

Frequently asked questions

How long does "Lateral Reading, Not Vertical" take?

This exercise takes about 8 minutes, practiced solo in a Behavioral format.

When will I notice the effect of "Lateral Reading, Not Vertical"?

You save 10-15 min reading untrustworthy site. In the short term: You filter trusted vs misleading sources before reading.

Is "Lateral Reading, Not Vertical" evidence-based?

Yes — it draws on Civic Online Reasoning (Sam Wineburg, Mike Caulfield (2017)). Wineburg's Stanford 2017 study compared expert (historian) reading with college students, proving "lateral reading" is the differentiating skill.

Is "Lateral Reading, Not Vertical" suitable for beginners?

Its difficulty level is: Intermediate. No external tools required — it can be practiced directly inside the app.

Subscribe for full access

Subscribe to Plus for full access to this practice and the whole catalogue, or try first — free, no sign-in, no commitment.

Interactive practice locked · 4 more steps locked

7 complete practices (one per domain) are free forever, no sign-in.