Coaching for Confidence vs. Coaching for Competence
First diagnose: does the person lack an actual skill (competence), or have it but not trust using it (confidence)? The treatment is entirely different for each.
Goal
Avoid the most common coaching mistake: offering extra skill training to someone who already has competence but lacks confidence, or the reverse — reassuring someone who genuinely lacks the actual skill.
Steps
-
1
Ask the person for a specific example of a situation they hesitated on or avoided (giving a presentation, confronting a client, making a decision).
Expected Outcome
Evidence base
School: Self-Efficacy Theory / Coaching Psychology
Founders: Albert Bandura · Timothy Gallwey (1997)
Based on Albert Bandura's Self-Efficacy theory (1997), distinguishing skill possession from belief in one's ability to use it, and its practical application in Timothy Gallwey's "The Inner Game" (1974), which separated the "inner game" (confidence) from the "outer game" (skill).
Keywords
Frequently asked questions
How long does "Coaching for Confidence vs. Coaching for Competence" take?
When will I notice the effect of "Coaching for Confidence vs. Coaching for Competence"?
Is "Coaching for Confidence vs. Coaching for Competence" evidence-based?
Is "Coaching for Confidence vs. Coaching for Competence" suitable for beginners?
Subscribe for full access
Subscribe to Plus for full access to this practice and the whole catalogue, or try first — free, no sign-in, no commitment.
7 complete practices (one per domain) are free forever, no sign-in.