Skip to content
Public preview

Worst-Best-Expected Scenario Analysis

Each big decision: 3 numeric scenarios, not "hope for the best".

30 min Intermediate

Goal

Replace random optimism with an outcome range built on explicit assumptions.

Steps

  1. 1
    Define the decision/investment.
5 more steps locked

Expected Outcome

Immediate
You find "worst" is bigger than thought — alters the decision.

Evidence base

School: Decision Analysis / Sensitivity Analysis

Founders: Howard Raiffa · Ralph Keeney (1976)

Raiffa (Harvard) & Keeney — Decisions With Multiple Objectives (1976); founded Decision Analysis as field.

Keywords

Frequently asked questions

How long does "Worst-Best-Expected Scenario Analysis" take?
This exercise takes about 30 minutes, practiced solo in a Written reflection format.
When will I notice the effect of "Worst-Best-Expected Scenario Analysis"?
You find "worst" is bigger than thought — alters the decision. In the short term: After 3 decisions, negative surprises drop sharply.
Is "Worst-Best-Expected Scenario Analysis" evidence-based?
Yes — it draws on Decision Analysis / Sensitivity Analysis (Howard Raiffa, Ralph Keeney (1976)). Raiffa (Harvard) & Keeney — Decisions With Multiple Objectives (1976); founded Decision Analysis as field.
Is "Worst-Best-Expected Scenario Analysis" suitable for beginners?
Its difficulty level is: Intermediate. No external tools required — it can be practiced directly inside the app.

Subscribe for full access

Subscribe to Plus for full access to this practice and the whole catalogue, or try first — free, no sign-in, no commitment.

Interactive practice locked · 5 more steps locked

7 complete practices (one per domain) are free forever, no sign-in.

Enjoyed it? Gift a journey Gift a journey