Innovation Portfolio Balance (Core/Adjacent/Transformational)
Distribute innovation investment roughly 70/20/10 across core (improving current), adjacent (nearby extension), transformational (future bet) — not all in one bucket.
Goal
Diagnose and correct a common imbalance in organizational innovation portfolios: full focus on improving the current (core) with zero investment in future bets (transformational) that might protect the organization from later disruption.
Steps
-
1
List all innovation or development initiatives currently running in your organization or department.
Expected Outcome
Evidence base
School: Innovation Portfolio Management / Strategy
Founders: Geoffrey Moore · Bansi Nagji · Geoff Tuff (2012)
Bansi Nagji and Geoff Tuff formulated the "70/20/10" innovation-portfolio-balance model in their Harvard Business Review article (2012), extending Geoffrey Moore's "Zone to Win" work on managing innovation alongside core business.
Keywords
Frequently asked questions
How long does "Innovation Portfolio Balance (Core/Adjacent/Transformational)" take?
When will I notice the effect of "Innovation Portfolio Balance (Core/Adjacent/Transformational)"?
Is "Innovation Portfolio Balance (Core/Adjacent/Transformational)" evidence-based?
Is "Innovation Portfolio Balance (Core/Adjacent/Transformational)" suitable for beginners?
Subscribe for full access
Subscribe to Plus for full access to this practice and the whole catalogue, or try first — free, no sign-in, no commitment.
7 complete practices (one per domain) are free forever, no sign-in.